Peaceintibet
Forum for discussions
Why does the Western Media neglect the blood of Chinese victims?
During March 14’s riot, media in the Western countries seldom mentioned the suffering of the victims in the riot, but only focuses on the appeal of “freedom” of the rioters. Even after all kinds of evidences clearly demonstrated the ferocity of the rioters (see www.peaceintibet.com), western media is only concerned with the arrests of the rioters and criminals. Why the “sympathetic” and “objective” Western media seems to be blind to the blood of Chinese victims?

A metaphor used by Dalai can shed light on the mind of the western media. In a meeting with journalists after the riot, he said, ““Last few days I had a sort of feeling, a tiger, of a young deer in a tiger’s hand,” The wolf-like brutality of the rioters was easily turned into the deer-like tenderness and helplessness. This is Dalai’s long-time strategy: to contrast his small group with China’s gigantic size and use his religious role as a pretext hiding his political intention. Such a method is actually quite common in the daily life, some people deliberately demonstrate their physical weakness to win the sympathy of the bystanders, but secretly attack the back of the stronger. The stronger are trapped into a predicament. His self-defense is even condemned as the misuse of violence. Only the victims attacked know the pain and are angry with the tricks. That’s the reason why Chinese perceive the Tibet-question so differently from the Westerners. (http://www.ftchinese.com/sc/story_english.jsp?id=001018078)


China’s situation is even worse. The dragon has always been conceived in the Westerns’ sub-consciousness as a huge menace. The government type chosen by Chinese people happens to be disliked by the Western countries as well. Its vast size, large population and powerful state provide Dalai Lama with the best chance to display his weakness as a contrast. The decades long negative reports and perceptions about China in the Western countries easily enable Dalai to close the eye of the media on the bloody truth. The biased view of the Western countries even cost the lives of more civilians. As a British journalists report, worried about the criticism, Chinese police did not take harsh measures against the rioters on the first day. (http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/asiapcf/03/20/tibet.miles.interview/index.html#cnnSTCText)


We ordinary Chinese people are not accusing Dalai of terrorism here. We know that we have not yet seen 100% evidence of his direct control of the riot. However, we are furious with his manipulation of the public opinion and the Western media’s indifference to the blood of our brothers and sisters.


We demand Dalai Lama to face the victims killed, injured and plundered by his followers and sincerely apologize to them. We demand Western Media to report the brutality widely and objectively to the public in their countries for the sake of TRUTH;

We demand International Community to condemn the responsible for the Tibetan violence, in order
to maintain the “moral authority” (Nancy Pelosi);

We support our government’s necessary measures to restore orders and protect people’s life and
property in the affected regions, support the juridical process against the criminals;

We welcome unbiased investigation of the violence;

and We wish all Han, Muslim and Tibetan Chinese reconcile the historic conflicts, continue the
economic development and construct a harmonious Tibet!


Please circulate wide!




2008-03-23 20:59:40 GMT
Comments (20 total)
Author:Anonymous
I agree totally!
2008-03-23 22:38:54 GMT
Author:Anonymous
http://forum.309area.com/index.php
2008-03-23 22:51:29 GMT
Author:Anonymous
Why does the Western Media neglect the blood of Chinese victims?

racism!!!
--T.J
2008-03-23 23:45:00 GMT
Author:Anonymous
support!
2008-03-24 01:01:08 GMT
Author:Anonymous
We must work hard to learn how to show using facts and truth.

Through the web media, our Chinese are getting the wonderful chance to influence on western people, especially youth and teenage, who spend more and more time on the web.

During the weekend, my friends worked out one memory video for the death in Tibet Violence.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vv1u5H4mye0

http://video.yahoo.com/watch/2252594/7098461

I can be reached at L16128@yahoo.com



--l16128
<mailto:l16128@yahoo.com>
2008-03-24 04:04:43 GMT
Author:Anonymous
We must work hard to learn how to show using facts and truth.

Through the web media, our Chinese are getting the wonderful chance to influence on western people, especially youth and teenage, who spend more and more time on the web.

During the weekend, my friends worked out one memory video for the death in Tibet Violence.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vv1u5H4mye0

http://video.yahoo.com/watch/2252594/7098461

I can be reached at l16128@yahoo.com
(first 1 is letter l, other are number)
--l16128
<mailto:l16128@yahoo.com>
2008-03-24 04:09:00 GMT
Author:Anonymous
added, thanks
2008-03-24 06:26:16 GMT
Author:Anonymous
support you!
2008-03-25 04:12:29 GMT
Author:Anonymous
Great site! I am going to show it to my colleages.
Thanks!
--Bill
2008-04-06 23:00:23 GMT
Author:Anonymous
Great to spread out the information!!!
Thank you!!
2008-04-09 07:12:21 GMT
Author:Anonymous
Everyone wish the unbiased truth to be shown to the world.

But how is that possible for the world to see the truth if China don't allow free reporting in Tibet?

And how can the chinese within china to see the truth when the chinese government limits their information?

As a chinese, I'm sadden that the chinese image is being damaged... but don't people always expect the worst when open information is not available?

Please understand the reaction of the western world when unbiased information is not available. We are all concern about the safety of tibetan and han chinese in tibet. But we assume that with all the military, safety of han is assured now, and that is why the western world is concern about the safety of tibetans. When someone confines information, the world will give benefit to the doubt.

If we chinese believe in truth, we should demand it from our government.
2008-04-09 21:54:30 GMT
Author:Anonymous
The point is just to show that nobody has moral authority. We all have our mistakes, but we should repair it in a mutually respecting manner.
--webmaster
2008-04-10 05:12:56 GMT
Author:Anonymous
Totally agree!! nobody has moral authority. Definitely not the western world! Especially when the "Americans" took the "Indians"'s land and now urging China to respect Tibet. China may as well learn from the great US, and call tibetans "Indians", it's all more convenient since their government is in India anyway, and call the Han chinese in Tibet "Tibetans", and if China is as kind hearted as the US, maybe 200 years later, we will grant the "Indians" the privilege to open casinos.

No, nobody has moral authority, yet we all have to have our own moral. But moral should be based on truth. And while people here are accusing the western media of biased reporting, I think we should rather demand our chinese government to let the world find out the truth.

Yes, I also agree that we all have mistakes and we should repair them in mutually respecting manner... but is the manner of the chinese government to Dalai respecting? How are we going to solve the problem without respect?
2008-04-10 15:27:36 GMT
Author:Anonymous
Well, the government has been opening the media a lot, and they held dialogues with Dalai. Hasty over-demanding can only cause hostility, since politics involve many other questions, such as stability, economics, public opinions etc..
--webmaster
2008-04-10 15:49:45 GMT
Author:Anonymous
By the way, the handling of foreign media in Tibet’s riot is largely considered as a mistake of the Chinese government, they definitely know it and are expected to improve it in the future.
--webmaster
2008-04-10 16:03:53 GMT
Author:Anonymous
if it's considered a mistake, shouldn't it be improved immediately? Or the chinese government decided to continue the mistake? Come on, controlled tours of reporters, showing only what they want to show, who in the world would buy that?

As far as i know, chinese government has stopped dialogues with His Holyness for years, but only continue to demonizing him without sound proof, and you call that respect?
--cripped rider
2008-04-10 16:49:52 GMT
Author:Anonymous
Be realistic, we never live in a perfect world. The correction of one mistake may risk even bigger mistakes, especially in such a sensitive circumstance. Both sides should do more practical efforts to facilitate improvements.
The talk stopped 2-3 years ago. Part of the reason is Dalai Lama’s “big Tibet” proposal. Don’t blame the government one-sided. The break-up of a dialogue usually is the fault of both sides.
--webmaster
2008-04-10 19:04:32 GMT
Author:Anonymous
To cripped rider:

Regarding your knowledge of "As far as i know, chinese government has stopped dialogues with His Holyness for years", please take a look at Wall Street Journal article "China Offers Tibet Talks With Envoy of Dalai Lama" (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120911168404944581.html?mod=hpp_us_whats_news). At the end of this article, you will find this: "Beijing and the representatives of the Tibetan government in exile held six rounds of talks between 2002 and mid-2007." So I wonder which Dalai Lama you were talking about?
--terminator
2008-05-09 05:12:49 GMT
Author:Anonymous
good information, thanks
--webmaster
2008-05-09 19:41:52 GMT
Author:Anonymous
Hi, I'm an ethnic Tibetan. Although I don't agree with everything you say, I respect your opinion and your overall point is very true. Thanks.
--Diki &quot;Dicky&quot; Dolma
2008-10-23 09:09:57 GMT
Compose a comment for this post.
Comment:
0 characters left (limit 4,000 characters). No HTML permitted.
Word verification:
To validate this comment, showing us that you are human, and not a computer, please retype the following code in the field provided.
(This helps prevent blog spam.)